<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oprah&#8217;s on Twitter!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/</link>
	<description>No You Do</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-51</guid>
		<description>So lastly, I ask: are you searching out your audience and engaging with them? If not, then there is no value. So yes, I love the numbers but more so I hope more actually USE it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So lastly, I ask: are you searching out your audience and engaging with them? If not, then there is no value. So yes, I love the numbers but more so I hope more actually USE it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Brandon, excellent points but that goes to exactly what I was saying... I&#039;m not bummed with the increase in usership. I don&#039;t mind all of my friends are now on it. But social media is just that: it&#039;s &quot;social&quot;. And the only benefit is to engage people outside of your circle. Follow and communicate with them not just see what your friends are doing &#039;cause that&#039;s facebook! Use twitter to engage and you&#039;ll find contacts and business if that&#039;s what you are looking for. And don&#039;t just seek em out online. Yes that could be a start but ask to meet for lunch or go to the many meetups and events and when people you follow are also there go meet them. That is the basis: engagement. And really, it&#039;s the only purpose of twitter, it&#039;s not facebook to tell about yourself and communicate with your friends instead it&#039;s an easy forum to follow and have others follow you without all the personal attachments and info &#039;til you get to a point where that is possible. I have at least one lunch a week with someone I met through twitter and we talk about what we&#039;re doing either in social media or start-ups in general. But, that goes two-way not just one! Oh and laso, yes, celebrities are using to increase their popularity/value, etc. which is super lame. But some do separate from that like lilly allen who plays a game with her fans in each city with riddles and whoever finds her gets free tix. Or Shaq who communicates with his fans and also does ticket giveaways. Again, two-way and engaging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon, excellent points but that goes to exactly what I was saying&#8230; I&#8217;m not bummed with the increase in usership. I don&#8217;t mind all of my friends are now on it. But social media is just that: it&#8217;s &#8220;social&#8221;. And the only benefit is to engage people outside of your circle. Follow and communicate with them not just see what your friends are doing &#8217;cause that&#8217;s facebook! Use twitter to engage and you&#8217;ll find contacts and business if that&#8217;s what you are looking for. And don&#8217;t just seek em out online. Yes that could be a start but ask to meet for lunch or go to the many meetups and events and when people you follow are also there go meet them. That is the basis: engagement. And really, it&#8217;s the only purpose of twitter, it&#8217;s not facebook to tell about yourself and communicate with your friends instead it&#8217;s an easy forum to follow and have others follow you without all the personal attachments and info &#8217;til you get to a point where that is possible. I have at least one lunch a week with someone I met through twitter and we talk about what we&#8217;re doing either in social media or start-ups in general. But, that goes two-way not just one! Oh and laso, yes, celebrities are using to increase their popularity/value, etc. which is super lame. But some do separate from that like lilly allen who plays a game with her fans in each city with riddles and whoever finds her gets free tix. Or Shaq who communicates with his fans and also does ticket giveaways. Again, two-way and engaging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Last thing I&#039;ll say.  The key to social media is &quot;the more the merrier.&quot;  Think about cell phones and email.  Those things work better when more people are using them.  Someone working for a social media company, let alone a start-up, should know that and be stoked when people use things like twitter and brightkite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last thing I&#8217;ll say.  The key to social media is &#8220;the more the merrier.&#8221;  Think about cell phones and email.  Those things work better when more people are using them.  Someone working for a social media company, let alone a start-up, should know that and be stoked when people use things like twitter and brightkite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Neil. I pay you homage. You did know about Twitter well before any of my other friends. And I am a newcomer. But, I still dislike Oprah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil. I pay you homage. You did know about Twitter well before any of my other friends. And I am a newcomer. But, I still dislike Oprah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hahahaha. Great picture!

Oh and Neil... I can&#039;t imagine your frustration.  I&#039;m guessing every celebrity that gets on Twitter isn&#039;t doing it for the &quot;networking&quot; and with a site that has grown by 700%, I don&#039;t think the someone who RTs your tweet can be considered a contact.  The only business benefit I&#039;ve (key word) TRULY found is getting quick news updates/summaries from respected sources without having to read whole articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahaha. Great picture!</p>
<p>Oh and Neil&#8230; I can&#8217;t imagine your frustration.  I&#8217;m guessing every celebrity that gets on Twitter isn&#8217;t doing it for the &#8220;networking&#8221; and with a site that has grown by 700%, I don&#8217;t think the someone who RTs your tweet can be considered a contact.  The only business benefit I&#8217;ve (key word) TRULY found is getting quick news updates/summaries from respected sources without having to read whole articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.diaferocollective.com/posts/2009/oprahs-on-twitter-367/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 01:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diaferocollective.com/?p=367#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Not making fun or anything but how long have you been on Twitter? I say that cause I&#039;m sure you can only imagine how I feel as I&#039;ve been using for well over a year now and initially it was an amazing networking tool as really the only users were fellow SM and start-up types. I&#039;m not too concerned about all the friends I&#039;ve seen join but I will say I get a lot less valuable content and I don&#039;t think people understand it&#039;s about engagement not a one-way conversation. Most of my updates are too others than &quot;what I&#039;m doing&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not making fun or anything but how long have you been on Twitter? I say that cause I&#8217;m sure you can only imagine how I feel as I&#8217;ve been using for well over a year now and initially it was an amazing networking tool as really the only users were fellow SM and start-up types. I&#8217;m not too concerned about all the friends I&#8217;ve seen join but I will say I get a lot less valuable content and I don&#8217;t think people understand it&#8217;s about engagement not a one-way conversation. Most of my updates are too others than &#8220;what I&#8217;m doing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
